Subject: Re: Using build.sh, a question
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: James Chacon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/21/2003 22:23:30
I've built twice in the last week and both release builds on x86
My alias to kick stuff off is:
alias bui='sh build.sh -O /usr/obj/`uname -m`/obj -R /usr/obj/`uname -m`/release -D /usr/obj/`uname -m`/build -T /usr/obj/`uname -m`/tools'
Then I can just
bui -U -u release
In both builds (desktop and a laptop) both went fine without errors and X
also built to release sets without error.
>On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:29:57PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> | On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:26AM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> | > #cd /usr/src
> | > #./build.sh -O /usr/obj -M /usr/obj -D /var/tmp/netbsd release >& build.log
> | ..
> | > Is this a reasonable way to build NetBSD, or is there some other process I
> | > should be using?
>It's not necessary to use both -O and -M; pick one or the other.
>(I personally prefer -M).
> | Yes, this sounds fine. I would probably add a -R to set the release dir
> | (since you are building a release).
>-R is not necessary since I made build.sh provide a default DESTDIR
>and RELEASEDIR unless you're using -E (which I don't recommend;
>only people who know more about the toolchain than I should use it,
>and they know who they are, and they can support themselves ;-)
> | > And, is anyone else seeing this problem?
>I haven't tested a full i386 build release in the last couple of days,
>but I'll update my sources and fire one off.
>For what it's worth, src/BUILDING has good, simple, functional, and
>working examples of how to use build.sh ...