Subject: Re: UFS2 problem or dump(8)?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Takahiro Kambe <email@example.com>
Date: 05/01/2003 15:03:53
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>
on 01 May 2003 12:40:11 +0900,
enami tsugutomo <email@example.com> wrote:
> > While full dump(8) success, incremental dump(8) seems to refer out of
> > range disk block.
> Try this (while there is another quetionalble code...).
Thanks. But I can't reproduce the problem now. I'll check if it
> --- traverse.c 8 Apr 2003 10:02:23 -0000 1.39
> +++ traverse.c 1 May 2003 03:33:57 -0000
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@
> if (is_ufs2)
> blk = iswap64(di.dp2.di_ib[i]);
> - blk = iswap32(di.dp2.di_ib[i]);
> + blk = iswap32(di.dp1.di_ib[i]);
Hmmm. I wonder that my full dump(8) made really correct backups.
Takahiro Kambe <firstname.lastname@example.org>