Subject: Re: NetBSD version naming - suggestion
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Frederick Bruckman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 04/25/2003 03:52:56
On 24 Apr 2003 email@example.com wrote:
> I've become a fan of the gnu-ish "ninety-something" version numbering,
> for development-trunk versions, e.g.:
> 2.0 major
> 2.0.90 branch development before release
> 2.1 patch release
> 2.1.90 branch development before release
> 2.2 patch release
> 2.90.0 development before next major.
> 2.90.1 development before next major, after abi change.
> 2.90.2 ...
> and if for some reason something *really* major happens on the trunk
> or branches, one could use 91, 92, etc. 8-)
I like that, too. It's very intuitive