Thanks for the confirming my hunch.



on 4/24/03 10:34 PM, James Chacon at jmc@netbsd.org wrote:

> Hmm...Yes. I see that.
> 
> Yes this should be fixed (I think a new batch of source tar balls may be
> coming for everything then).
> 
> In the meantime you can fix locally by either using cvs -d <cvsroot path>
> or simply replacing all the Root files with the anoncvs ones.
> 
> James
> 
>> 
>> 
>> The sets were built from a CVS tree:
>> 
>> tlp0: {8} cat Root
>> autobuild@zathras.local:/cvsroot
>> tlp0: {9} 
>> 
>> How can I make sure that my local source tree is able to be patched should
>> some security holes ever crop up?  Is there a reason the sets weren't built
>> from a public cvs server -- am I not getting the point?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> peter
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
>