Subject: Re: New power management framework for sysmon
To: David Maxwell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <email@example.com>
Date: 04/21/2003 13:59:43
In message <20030421171018.GQ12714@vex>, David Maxwell writes:
>On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 09:24:15AM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>> On Monday, April 21, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:
>> >Whether software interupts are handled by the BIOS or the kernel
>> >change much ... although I guess the kernel is a bit more likely to go
>> >incommunicado. You (kernel) switch the fans off, block interupts,
>> >go into a tight loop -> the machine will melt, right?
>> But you can't really have it both ways. If you're handing power
>> management related traps/interrupts, the firmware can't be.
>Well, the software could have been allowed to configure the settings,
>then the firmware could be in charge of operation. In that way, you
>could get the best of both worlds.
>The other option would be for the firmware to have a watchdog-like
>behaviour. If the OS doesn't poke it periodically, it escalates the
>cooling (or powerdown) state, to be safe.
Hmm -- guess I'd better get working on my software watchdog timer
>> If you want to leave a machine like that unattended for the weekend,
>> then make sure the fans are on. Such machines tend to be servers or
>> non-laptop workstations anyway, right?
My laptop tends to stay on all the time....
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)