--- Greg Oster <oster@cs.usask.ca> wrote:
> > Why is using 1023872? is the 128 reserved for the raid disk label?
> 
> 64 are reserved for the RAIDframe component label.  The actual number
> of 
> blocks used will be just a multiple of 128 (which 1023872 is.)

Greg, reviewing all my previous emails...

Does that mean I should offset 64 sectors at the begining of each raid
disklabel? Or does RAIDframe reserve it elsewhere? In my tests, I
started the raid disklabel at 0 offset.

Thomas

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo
http://search.yahoo.com