Subject: Re: Horrible RAIDFrame Crash
To: Greg Oster <>
From: Caffeinate The World <>
List: current-users
Date: 04/16/2003 15:31:53
--- Greg Oster <> wrote:
> > Why is using 1023872? is the 128 reserved for the raid disk label?
> 64 are reserved for the RAIDframe component label.  The actual number
> of 
> blocks used will be just a multiple of 128 (which 1023872 is.)

Greg, reviewing all my previous emails...

Does that mean I should offset 64 sectors at the begining of each raid
disklabel? Or does RAIDframe reserve it elsewhere? In my tests, I
started the raid disklabel at 0 offset.


Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo