Subject: Re: NetBSD version naming - suggestion
To: Martin Weber <Ephaeton@gmx.net>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>
Date: 04/15/2003 10:55:08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:35:09AM +0200, Martin Weber wrote:
> I think what *might* be helpful was to name -current after the release
> it has passed. I.e. 1.6A-R, 1.6.1A-x ... so you'd clearly saw which
> one was younger. Anyways, I like our version naming scheme...
this doesn't make sense at all. -current is a separate branch, created
off 1.6. 1.6.1 is *not* made from -current, it's only a bugfix release
made from 1.6 sources (more precisely netbsd-1-6 branch).
i personally find the current scheme fine and the odd/even version
naming is actually *more* confusing, imho.
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org> --
-- <email@example.com> --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----