--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 10:35:09AM +0200, Martin Weber wrote:
>=20
> I think what *might* be helpful was to name -current after the release
> it has passed. I.e. 1.6A-R, 1.6.1A-x ... so you'd clearly saw which
> one was younger. Anyways, I like our version naming scheme...

this doesn't make sense at all. -current is a separate branch, created
off 1.6.  1.6.1 is *not* made from -current, it's only a bugfix release
made from 1.6 sources (more precisely netbsd-1-6 branch).

i personally find the current scheme fine and the odd/even version
naming is actually *more* confusing, imho.


regards.

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@Xtrmntr.org>                   --
--                  <salo@silcnet.org>                   --

--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD)

iD4DBQE+m8jsiwjDDlS8cmMRAnAoAJihnlzYGssY4/QkYAE+2dPl8hfBAJ9JjQaU
mSe9dTtEtB9Q9RU9XsbMmg==
=i7jn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yQbNiKLmgenwUfTN--