Subject: Re: NEW_BUFQ really cool!
To: Takahiro Kambe <email@example.com>
From: Martin Weber <Ephaeton@gmx.net>
Date: 03/31/2003 10:43:03
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 08:46:20AM +0900, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
> Is NEW_BUFQ really stable?
> In message <Pine.NEB.firstname.lastname@example.org>
> on Sun, 30 Mar 2003 19:02:42 +0200 (CEST),
> Wojciech Puchar <email@example.com> wrote:
> > my system works for 6 days, no crash, no errors in dmesg, loaded all the
> > time quite heavy.
> I've lost my local CVS repogitry once. You should check it under
> heavy file system access.
I'm using it successfully for some time, and also under high load. You
said later it was in conjunction with softdeps, well, I don't use softdeps,
for I don't consider the softdeps stable. I consider NEW_BUFQ on its own
as stable though. And you don't need to enable NEW_BUFQ on a softdeps
partition to get crashes and data loss :)