Subject: Re: Help me defend NetBSD's honor!
To: Jason R Thorpe <>
From: Perry E. Metzger <>
List: current-users
Date: 03/09/2003 11:46:25
Jason R Thorpe <> writes:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 10:57:59AM -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>  > Not even any need to do that -- we should simply create an option that
>  > replaces the consinit() in init_main.c:main() with a call that
>  > initializes the function pointers to dummys. Then it will be MI and
>  > all ports can have the functionality.
> Maybe you haven't noticed, but machine-dependent code often likes to
> call consinit() much earlier than main() does.

So it seems (Quentin Garnier pointed this out earlier), though either
way I think the principle on how to fix this may be the same...

Perry E. Metzger