Subject: Re: libpthread busted?
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Nathan J. Williams <email@example.com>
Date: 03/05/2003 12:20:27
Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > The SDL shared library object does not have a recorded
> > dependance on libpthread.so, so applications need to be
> > explicit.
> This seems like a very obvious bug.
I'm not so sure. Given that the supported way of including SDL in an
application is via "cc `sdl-config --cflags` app.c `sdl-config
--libs`", it's not clear that there's value to library dependancies.
Having SDL contain a recorded dependance on libpthread.so would make
the p5-SDL problem more difficult; perl really has no interest in
dynamically loading libpthread.so.