Subject: Re: How to format u_int64_t on sparc64?
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 02/27/2003 16:27:51
[ On Thursday, February 27, 2003 at 12:27:23 (-0800), Jason R Thorpe wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: How to format u_int64_t on sparc64?
>
>  > Meanwhile casting to an explicit basic integer type that's sure to be at
>  > least as wide as the value to be formatted and then just using the
>  > proper explicit format specifier for that basic integer type will also
>  > obviously work too, just as good C programmers have been doing for time
>  > immemorial:
>  > 
>  > 	printf("%llu", (unsigned long long) var_u64);
> 
> You mean GNU C programmers -- "unsigned long long" is not a C89 type.

No, for dealing with 64-bit unsigned values, I mean C99 programmers.  ;-)

Obviously you couldn't have been talking about C89 either.

If you're going to embrace a new standard then you really should embrace
it all!  ;-)

(which is why I don't embrace C99 at all!  ;-)

-- 
								Greg A. Woods

+1 416 218-0098;            <g.a.woods@ieee.org>;           <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>