In message <200302182135.h1ILZOw28828@s102-n054.tele2.cz>, Jaromir Dolecek writ
es:
>Hi,
>
>SMBFS support in -current is now in somewhat useable state. If you
>are feeling brave, try out if it works for you.  I'd be grateful
>for any reports - so far I have it only tested on local network
>against Samba server using NetBSD/i386 machines. If you are going
>to experiment with it, you might want to update to Samba 2.2.7anb1
>from pkgsrc - nb1 contains a fix for one minor problem I encountered
>while testing this. Only i386 currently  
>
>Basic operations on SMBFS seem to be working fine (read, write,
>create, mount, unmount), but it would be necessary to stress it
>more to be certain everything works fine. There is currently no
>support for different character encodings, i.e. -E option doesn't
>actually work at this moment.
>
>To try this, you need:
>1. up-to-date kernel - the latest committed change was
>   rev 1.4 of src/sys/fs/smbfs/smbfs_node.h, if you get that version,
>   your other files should be up-to-date too
>1a. enable file-system SMBFS and pseudo-device nsmb in your kernel
>   config - see i386 GENERIC rev. 1.547 - rebuild and reboot

I'm unable to compile a kernel, even GENERIC:  I get

	opt_smb.h: No such file or directory

this is with a fresh cvs update.

>2. mount_smbfs - update src/dist/smbfs, src/sbin/mount_smbfs, and
>   build mount_smbfs
>3. dev nodes - either get src/etc/etc.i386/MAKEDEV rev. 1.191,
>   or create necessary nodes by (i386):
>	mknod c /dev/nsmb0 98 0
>	mknod c /dev/nsmb1 98 1
>	mknod c /dev/nsmb2 98 2
>	mknod c /dev/nsmb3 98 3
>
I assume you mean

	mknod /dev/nsmb? c 98 ?


		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com (2nd edition of "Firewalls" book)