Subject: Re: Running just one -current program.
To: Richard Rauch <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Johnny Billquist <email@example.com>
Date: 02/04/2003 13:55:20
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Richard Rauch wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 08:25:30PM +1100, Giles Lean wrote:
> > > If one doesn't have a machine to spare for -current, what's the
> > > best way to work on a relatively static program? Unpack 1.6 sources
> > > and work on that? Link against the *installed* 1.6 libraries?
> > Yes -- just compile your program on 1.6. You will quite likely
> Well, I asked because when I tried that initially (in a freshly set
> up -current source tree), "make" or "make window" in the appropriate
> directory failed. It seemed to want all of the context for making
> everything, so I stepped up to the top level and did "./bulid.sh build".
setenv USETOOLS no
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: firstname.lastname@example.org || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol