Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Chuck Yerkes <email@example.com>
Date: 01/31/2003 14:36:05
Quoting D'Arcy J.M. Cain (darcy@NetBSD.org):
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 16:20, Chuck Yerkes wrote:
> > Yeah, I have enough fears running Databases on non-raw devices,
> > let alone over a network - everything I want a databse for
> > is compromised by having the data files on a network device.
> > Speed (100base T gets you maybe 10MB/s throughput with nothing
> > else there), NFS adds overhead, buffering (non device commits),
> > locking issues and so forth.
> Interesting. I would sure like some other opinions on that. The reason for
> going with the NetApp is to use their snapmirror feature in order to copy a
> live database at an instant in time. Using something like rsync fails
> sometimes because the database could change enough during the sync that it
> can't recover enough to start.
I've long backed up large databases by mirroring then breaking
Or you kick it into log-only mode, copy the data and then play out
I really really *do* like NetApps. Really. But NFS is not
the answer to every problem.
I like my table saw too, but it sucks at making small holes.