Subject: Re: integrating PAM
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Dan Melomedman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/27/2003 13:47:49
David Maxwell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:58:18PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> > [ On Thursday, January 23, 2003 at 22:54:49 (-0500), David Maxwell wrote: ]
> > > Subject: Re: integrating PAM
> > >
> > > There exist buggy PAM modules != PAM is bad.
> > Yes, but the number lines-of-code does give a good hint towards the
> > number of bugs that might be expected in it.
> Thanks for retrying the Dan's argument again.
> How many lines-of-code are there in NetBSD's PAM implementation?
Bzzt. That was in reference to the pam-ldap module lines of code, not
NetBSD PAM implementation lines of code.