On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:58:18PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Thursday, January 23, 2003 at 22:54:49 (-0500), David Maxwell wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: integrating PAM
> >
> > There exist buggy PAM modules != PAM is bad.
> 
> Yes, but the number lines-of-code does give a good hint towards the
> number of bugs that might be expected in it.

Bzzzt.

Thanks for retrying the Dan's argument again.

How many lines-of-code are there in NetBSD's PAM implementation?

ZERO. It doesn't exist yet.

Please complain about aspects of the API, which somewhat exists, (i.e.
to be able to use existing PAM modules, some set of functions _must_ be
implemented) if you can.

-- 
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net -->
Any sufficiently advanced Common Sense will seem like magic... 
					      - me