Subject: Re: integrating PAM
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 01/25/2003 22:47:15
[ On Wednesday, January 22, 2003 at 00:05:13 (-0800), Simon J. Gerraty wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: integrating PAM
> >Note BSD Auth can use PAM modules, but as I understand it, not the other
> Some PAM modules perhaps but not those that want/need to tweak the
> state of the original process.
Apparently, as has been revealed, that's not actually a problem (not
that I ever believed it was :-).
> Note I have no objection to BSD Auth, and making it an option (via PAM
> perhaps) sounds like a good idea. But it is far from a "standard"
> (further than PAM anyway) and does not address all the issues PAM does.
It seems BSD-Auth is at least as "standard" as PAM. :-)
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <email@example.com>; <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Planix, Inc. <email@example.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <firstname.lastname@example.org>