Subject: Re: daddr_t change
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
From: Martin Husemann <martin@duskware.de>
List: current-users
Date: 01/25/2003 12:51:38
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Ignatios Souvatzis wrote:

> How do we print such a beast canonically? cast to (int64_t), then %q ?

The current practice for similar types is casting to (long long) and using
"%lld" or "%llu".

IIRC %q is not standard.

In this context I think the cast is not necessary, since it's explicitly a 64
bit type anyway, right?


Martin