On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Jason R Thorpe wrote:

> I've been trying to avoid getting involved with this thread because, well,
> threads like this end up being a complete waste of time.
> 
> But in any case...
> 
> Whichever system NetBSD ends up adopting for pluggable authentication
> schemes, be it BSD Auth, PAM, or TimbuktuAuthSchemeDeluxeKRadHellaSecure,
> the decision will be based on its technical merits, after careful
> consideration of the plusses and minuses of each scheme being considered.

A very good point.

Could we now consider overhead a bit more in the future.
My VAX8650 needs between five and six days to compile userland as it
is. NetBSD is risking to become a real bloatware product...

	Johnny

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt@update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol