Subject: Re: integrating PAM
To: None <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: current-users
Date: 01/23/2003 13:27:56
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:03:11PM -0500, Dan Melomedman wrote:

 > I thought PAM proponents' reasons were more of the "Because everybody
 > else supports it, get with the program" and "Because I want to use 
 > module blah", not exactly technical merits.

Well, besides the fact that "code portability" is actually a valid
technical argument (standards compliance is a goal of a NetBSD Project),
those are not the only arguments that people have put forward in support
of PAM.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>