Subject: Re: integrating PAM
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/23/2003 13:27:56
On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 03:03:11PM -0500, Dan Melomedman wrote:
> I thought PAM proponents' reasons were more of the "Because everybody
> else supports it, get with the program" and "Because I want to use
> module blah", not exactly technical merits.
Well, besides the fact that "code portability" is actually a valid
technical argument (standards compliance is a goal of a NetBSD Project),
those are not the only arguments that people have put forward in support
of PAM.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>