Subject: Re: UVM/other problems for desktop users in current?
To: Matt Rickard <mjr318@psu.edu>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org>
List: current-users
Date: 12/19/2002 10:47:40 
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 06:10:35PM -0500, Matt Rickard wrote:
  | > FWIW, maxvnodes is probably "better" as a power-of-2, since the hash
  | > table size is rounded up to the next power-of-2 anyway.
  | > 
  | 
  | What would be the reason for the default of 17191 (not a power of 2)?

It's calculated off other systems parameters at boot time.
We could investigate automagically bumping this.