Subject: Re: UVM/other problems for desktop users in current?
To: Matt Rickard <email@example.com>
From: Luke Mewburn <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/19/2002 10:47:40
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 06:10:35PM -0500, Matt Rickard wrote:
| > FWIW, maxvnodes is probably "better" as a power-of-2, since the hash
| > table size is rounded up to the next power-of-2 anyway.
| What would be the reason for the default of 17191 (not a power of 2)?
It's calculated off other systems parameters at boot time.
We could investigate automagically bumping this.