Subject: Re: UVM/other problems for desktop users in current?
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Matt Rickard <mjr318@psu.edu>
List: current-users
Date: 12/18/2002 18:10:35 
>
> FWIW, maxvnodes is probably "better" as a power-of-2, since the hash
> table size is rounded up to the next power-of-2 anyway.
> 

What would be the reason for the default of 17191 (not a power of 2)?