Subject: Re: UVM/other problems for desktop users in current? To: None <email@example.com> From: Matt Rickard <firstname.lastname@example.org> List: current-users Date: 12/18/2002 18:10:35
> FWIW, maxvnodes is probably "better" as a power-of-2, since the hash
> table size is rounded up to the next power-of-2 anyway.
What would be the reason for the default of 17191 (not a power of 2)?