Subject: Re: Did I miss a thread on build.sh and the "-E" flag?
To: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 12/16/2002 12:51:42
On Mon, 16 Dec 2002, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 10:02:02 +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 08:49:52AM -0800, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> > | I know I'm not supposed to build to "/" but it's easy and I've hosed my
> > | system several times by trying to manually copy files from a different
> > | DESTDIR.
> > There's a solution for this now; after a "make DESTDIR=/foo build" do
> > cd distrib/sets
> > make DESTDIR=/foo INSTALLDIR=/ installsets
> I thought we were supposed to use build.sh? I am still confused about
> the "right" way to upgrade from sources.
You can also:
build.sh -D /foo .....
make DESTDIR=/foo INSTALLDIR=/ installsets
Yes, build.sh is the right thing to do.
> Can this be documented in http://www.netbsd.org/Documentation/current?
> It now says: "To build the binaries into some other location (in case
> you're paranoid about tromping on a running system), just alter the
> DESTDIR setting, ...". So DESTDIR is only for paranoids? And it does
> not explain what to do after a build -D.
The "paranoid" bit should be removed.