Subject: Re: Any point to cvs using rsh? (was Re: Anoncvs pointer)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mike Pumford <email@example.com>
Date: 12/13/2002 18:44:01
> FreeBSD has already done this:
> replaces both points where 'cvs_rsh = "rsh";' in client.c.
Yes and it screws up usage of the FreeBSD cvs in an environment where rsh is
used (at least that was my experience) as it ignored CVS_RSH when it was set
to rsh. This was 4.7-RELEASE.
When you are supporting CVS in an environment with a lot of different clients
changing defaults like this can cause a lot of confusion.