Subject: Re: Any point to cvs using rsh? (was Re: Anoncvs pointer)
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com>
List: current-users
Date: 12/13/2002 10:24:41
Chuck Yerkes <chuck+nbsd@2003.snew.com> writes:
> Is there any reason not to just have CVS (and rsync and rdist)
> just use ssh by default?
None but history. I would love to see patches that fix this by
default.
Those that want to still use rsh can turn that on, of course, but
defaults are for what most people want...
Perry