Subject: Re: Any point to cvs using rsh? (was Re: Anoncvs pointer)
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Perry E. Metzger <email@example.com>
Date: 12/13/2002 10:24:41
Chuck Yerkes <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Is there any reason not to just have CVS (and rsync and rdist)
> just use ssh by default?
None but history. I would love to see patches that fix this by
Those that want to still use rsh can turn that on, of course, but
defaults are for what most people want...