Subject: Re: newfs can't make filesystems over 1TB in size
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <email@example.com>
Date: 12/11/2002 09:14:23
On Monday, 9 December 2002 at 20:18:39 -0800, Bill Studenmund wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Brian Buhrow wrote:
>> Hi Luke. Hmm. I hope one of the folks you indicated will comment, as
>> this 1TB fs limit is going to become an issue, I think, as we use more and
>> more larger disks, especially for those of us fond of raid controllers and
>> raidframe software.
>> On another note, I notice that all the disk driver front ends
>> report their disk capacities as signed 32-bit integers. If I walk through
>> and convert them to use unsigned 32-bit integers, and submit the changes as
>> a pr, how likely, do you think, that such a change would get rolled into
>> the source tree?
> Uhm, why not change them all to off_t? Even though you're not changing
> size, you're changing semantics, and so you'd have to supply compatability
> calls for everything (where the values make it to userland), so why not
> just fix things once & for all?
Why not just port UFS 2 from FreeBSD?
Finger firstname.lastname@example.org for PGP public key
See complete headers for address and phone numbers