Subject: Re: newfs can't make filesystems over 1TB in size
To: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Brian Buhrow <email@example.com>
Date: 12/09/2002 22:59:13
On Dec 9, 8:18pm, Bill Studenmund wrote:
} Subject: Re: newfs can't make filesystems over 1TB in size
} Uhm, why not change them all to off_t? Even though you're not changing
} size, you're changing semantics, and so you'd have to supply compatability
} calls for everything (where the values make it to userland), so why not
} just fix things once & for all?
Hi bill. Are you suggesting that I should consider
changing the on-disk format of disklabel such that the size of a partition
is represented by an off_t, a 64-bit signed value? Do you think this might
be overkill since NetBSD seems to already address physical disk sectors as
unsigned 32-bit valuse, a state of affairs which will currently let us talk
to a 4-TB disk? I was merely thinking that the disk drivers and
disklabel(8) program ought to reflect that reality and print out meaningful
data. Is there a semantic I'm missing, and unintentionally changing?
Changing the on-disk format seems like quite a significant one, and
something to be worked toward, whereas I was mostly suggesting a cosmetic
change, initially, at least, which would improve the usability of NetBSD.
Please tell me if I'm missing something, because I certainly
want to do what's best for NetBSD as I strive to make it work well with
these huge data stores.