Subject: Re: /rescue
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@netbsd.org>
List: current-users
Date: 11/04/2002 21:44:59
On Sun, Nov 03, 2002 at 06:14:41PM -0600, Richard Rauch wrote:
| (I'm also distressed to hear that the size of
| the /rescue binaries was the issue. /rescue is supposed to be
| static-linked; size isn't so crucial, is it?)
In what way is the size of the /rescue binaries the "issue" ?
IIRC, the only negative comments relating to the size of /rescue
were uninformed complaints from people (who had obviously not fully
read the original proposal) who were concerned that the space consumed
in `/' would grow with the change. (The actual situation with dynamic
/{bin,sbin} and /rescue is that you *save* space on `/').