Subject: Re: /rescue
To: None <lennart@augustsson.net>
From: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
List: current-users
Date: 11/03/2002 14:13:26
In message <3DC552E5.3040302@augustsson.net>, Lennart Augustsson writes:
>Well, we were promised that the performance problems with dynamically
>linked binaries would be solved (before switching to a dynamic /bin?), I 
>guess
>they were not.

I wonder if the issue is system performance vs. program performance on 
a microbenchmark.   That is, a whole system might perform faster if 
only one copy of libc had to be resident, but each individual command 
might be a bit slower.

		--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb (me)
		http://www.wilyhacker.com ("Firewalls" book)