Subject: Re: Status of NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY?
To: enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp>
From: Markus W Kilbinger <kilbi@rad.rwth-aachen.de>
List: current-users
Date: 11/01/2002 11:49:45
>>>>> "enami" == enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp> writes:
enami> Urban Boquist <urban@boquist.net> writes:
>> >> --- trap (number 6) ---
>> >> bufq_prio_get(c07a689c,1,c0420bf0,c02332e6) at bufq_prio_get+0x5b
>>
enami> Is this repeatable? I have two machine with this option
enami> enabled but it runs without panic (both uses wd).
>> It panic's my i386 (dual athlon, wd) and my tibook (macppc,
>> wd), too.
enami> Hmm, and you both don't have options QUEUEDEBUG in your
enami> kernel config, right (if it has, it panics)?
Yes, I don't have any special debug option enabled.
My i386 panics with a simple kernel panic line and reboots.
On my tibook I had a new 'reaction' last night: Instead of a panic I
get now a sequence of wdc0 timeouts... with the severe result that the
disklabel is destroyed! (Sigh... Any chance to reconstruct it?)
Anything special I could test?
Markus.