Subject: Re: Status of NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY?
To: enami tsugutomo <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Sean Davis <email@example.com>
Date: 10/31/2002 23:45:58
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 01:40:42PM +0900, enami tsugutomo wrote:
> Urban Boquist <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > --- trap (number 6) ---
> > bufq_prio_get(c07a689c,1,c0420bf0,c02332e6) at bufq_prio_get+0x5b
> Is this repeatable? I have two machine with this option enabled but
> it runs without panic (both uses wd).
I gave NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY a try last week, and noticed that while it does seem to
drastically improve responsiveness when under heavy load, some things (starting
an xterm, in my case) sometimes took close to a full minute to happen. Is this
a known side-effect of NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY? does this happen on your two machines
with the option?
/~\ The ASCII
\ / Ribbon Campaign Sean Davis
X Against HTML aka dive
/ \ Email!