Subject: Re: verified executable kernel modification committed
To: Brett Lymn <email@example.com>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/29/2002 20:17:11
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 11:41:08AM +1030, Brett Lymn wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 09:05:25AM +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> > At a minimum, the control program (and associated examples) should be
> > "veriexecctl" or something like that (instead of "verifiedexec_load").
> > As for the kernel option name, that's probably OK.
> Sure, sounds good to me. I thought that verifiedexec_load was a bit
> of a mouthful.
I don't find "veriexecctl" much better, frankly. It's still hugely long
and will force ls output into a smaller number of columns, which is
annoying. Please pick a more Unixy name.
Thor Lancelot Simon email@example.com
But as he knew no bad language, he had called him all the names of common
objects that he could think of, and had screamed: "You lamp! You towel! You
plate!" and so on. --Sigmund Freud