Subject: Re: FYI: upgrading GNU tar
To: None <rmk@rmkhome.com>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: current-users
Date: 10/14/2002 15:26:54
[ On Monday, October 14, 2002 at 02:37:17 (-0600), Rick Kelly wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: FYI: upgrading GNU tar
>
> Giles Lean said:
> >
> >... and what you wrote is not a portable tar archive, so you'll need
> >GNU tar to recover it, I expect. Breaking at backup time rather than
> >recovery time could be considered a feature: that way at least you
> >know what you're dealing with while you have the data on-disk and can
> >decide what to do about it.
>
> So, pax can't really replace GNU tar...
Actualy it mostly can, as can star (in this case star might even be a
better replacement). The problem isn't quite so bad as you're making it
out to be.
> Think of all the thousands of NetBSD backup tapes that were done with
> GNU tar.
>
> Think of the hundreds of thousands of systems worldwide that use GNU tar
> as the default version of tar.
Think of how easy it is to type "pkg_add gtar" before you load your
recovery tape and complete the restore.....
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <g.a.woods@ieee.org>; <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>