On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 netbsd99@sudog.com wrote:

> I would like to make a suggestion for those who are anti-PAM ...

I would like to make a suggestion for those who are pro-PAM!  ...

Why not go ahead and implement PAM, and have a completely default
installation work _just_like_ the old, pre-PAM installs do, nsswitch
and all?

I really don't care about PAM one way or the other, but the old method
nsswitch works just fine for me.  Please don't make me have to learn a
whole new (and apparently, rather convoluted and not necessarily self-
consistent) configuration mechanism just to stay with what I already
have and understand.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Paul Goyette   | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: |  E-mail addresses:   |
| Network Engineer | 9DC5 05CF 1AE7 DC42 CCC6 |  paul@whooppee.com   |
|  & World Cruiser | 6858 051E 7AD2 A6B2 4954 | pgoyette@juniper.net |
----------------------------------------------------------------------