-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Dan Melomedman wrote:

>Bill Studenmund wrote:
>> Is your objection to PAM that there should be an easy way to write
>> modules? Because you can do that with PAM; just write the auth system you
>> are describing as a PAM module!
>
>I doubt writing a PAM module would be so easy, or portable. But who
>knows; maybe you guys will be able to roll out something which is PAM
>but at the same time as easy to use, debug, etc. I have yet to find
>something like this, so I have my doubts.

The large number of PAM modules out there, compared to the small number
of programs using exec-chaining suggests otherwise.

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9kkIclGcH240chEIRAgrHAJ9JT3H0tPHAShMFhglnnIqroa6nRACeM0d+
9j9zxocOSMICK6+KaTaha3U=
=Fkkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----