Subject: Re: PAM
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Dan Melomedman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/25/2002 19:03:24
Bill Studenmund wrote:
> Is your objection to PAM that there should be an easy way to write
> modules? Because you can do that with PAM; just write the auth system you
> are describing as a PAM module!
I doubt writing a PAM module would be so easy, or portable. But who
knows; maybe you guys will be able to roll out something which is PAM
but at the same time as easy to use, debug, etc. I have yet to find
something like this, so I have my doubts.