Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Jed Davis <jdev@panix.com>
List: current-users
Date: 09/25/2002 01:49:04
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 06:05:05PM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> The actual 'problem' is that references to code functions within a
> library have to be looked up (rather than being fixed to relative
> junps by the linker). This is an ELF 'feature' that makes it easy
> for an application program to completely kill the operation of a
> library by 'accidentally' defining a function with the same name
> as a library function.
For extra fun, define global data with the same name as a library
function; preferably the name should be that of a well-known call that
the program doesn't use directly (so no compiler warnings) but that a
loadable module that the program doesn't deal with directly (e.g. an
nsswitch plugin) does use. (My instance: "uname" with glibc and NIS.)
--Jed (and now, back to your regularly scheduled programming)
--
<?xml version="1.0"?> <?xml-stylesheet href="http://panix.com/~jdev/xs/txt.xsl"
type="text/xsl"?> <sig name="Jed Davis"> <id dom="oberlin.edu" lp="sjld8197">
Student, 4th-Year</id><id dom="cs.oberlin.edu" lp="jldavis">CS Major and Student
SysAdmin</id><id dom="panix.com" lp="jdev">Panixer</id> <q href="bin.q"/> </sig>