Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: David Laight <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Michael G. Schabert <email@example.com>
Date: 09/03/2002 04:58:02
>Shell performance would be improved by putting a little effort
>into making more commands builtin.
I really wouldn't like to see shells change from being fairly
standard, "known quantities" to being monolithic behemoths that
assimilate file commands. It would be A Bad Thing for compatibility
and a uniform user experience IMO. It would also have to be redundant
for switch compatibility and for compat. with user-installed shells.
Bikers don't *DO* taglines.