On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Greg Oster wrote:

> > 	Would there be any utility in an option to postpone the raidctl -P
> > 	until after the fsck has been run on a disk? Somewhat compromises
> > 	redundancy in favour of getting the system running faster.
>
> Yes.  As much as it would be nice to have the "raidctl -P"'s done *before* the
> fsck, in practise it is better to delay the "raidctl -P"'s until after the
> system is up to multi-user... (or at least through the fsck and/or
> quota-checks).  Having fscks and quota-checks fighting with RAIDframe for disk
> bandwidth is not a good way to quickly bring a system up.
>
> If you're volunteering to write such an option, I say "go for it!" :)

	Presumably all we need to do is split the raidframe rc.d script
	into a second 'raidframeparity' which runs later?

-- 
		David/absolute          -- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --