Subject: Re: PAM
To: Giles Lean <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Roland Dowdeswell <email@example.com>
Date: 08/29/2002 17:14:45
On 1030586285 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Giles Lean wrote:
>Andrew Gillham wrote:
>> Does anyone have any idea how much of the available PAM code is BSD
>> licensed versus GPL or other?
>The only implementations of the PAM framework that I know about are
>commercial (Sun, HP, ...) and GPL (Linux).
>> e.g. Will it be necessary to implement the basic PAM support from
>> scratch? Will we be able to use a large percentage of PAM modules
>> in a BSD environment without worrying about the GPL?
>Framework probably has to be done from scratch, unless the author(s)
>of the Linux code can be persuaded to release their implementation
>under a BSD license.
Linux PAM is dual licensed, and frankly a very small amount of code
Roland Dowdeswell http://www.Imrryr.ORG/~elric/