-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:

>[ On Wednesday, August 28, 2002 at 17:38:17 (-0700), Greywolf wrote: ]
>> Subject: Re: PAM
>>
>> Hello?  *waves*  Hi.  Please don't assume that, just because the CPU,
>> disk, and memory can support bloat, they should be expected to.  That
>> attitude miffs me more than anything.  "Oh, we have the space/RAM/CPU
>> power to handle it, who cares?"
>
>Do _you_ really want all that extra locale support on your ancient
>hardware?  Are you sure you didn't just red-line on the word "bloat"?
>
>_I_ don't want all that extra locale support bloat in any form (and I

And here we come to the crux of the matter.  Because _you_ don't plan to
use the new features made available by this, you don't think it should
be implemented, and you're bound and determined to argue against it.

Well, you know what?  You can always set MKDYNAMICROOT=no.  You can
always come up with your own patches to make the system just like you
want it.  Or you can always go run something else.

The fact that you don't want to have more than en_US available is noted.
It carries as much weight as any other user's preference.  And no more.

- -- 
				Jim Wise
				jwise@draga.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQE9bj5gN71lEcOYcw4RAg7NAJ9N2MZtKxiCA/dU11WGvFEF3IOs0wCfS+TR
2DEEkAYXZiS6KooaLmQ1ZoY=
=vgdn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----