Subject: Re: PAM
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <>
From: None <>
List: current-users
Date: 08/27/2002 16:50:52
> > - PAM is standard.
> "Standard"?  I don't think so.  It's common, but it's far from being a
> real standard.  I wonder if the GNU/Linux implementation can even load
> and use a binary Solaris plugin (assuming it's for the same target CPU).

PAM is a standard.

NH 3.4.0nb1U D ben-** HP:99(99) PW:99(99) AC:-10 *
             [++ ) P- S !D p-- $++ !t s+++ w+ E-- PS PP G- C+ I+ @W(3) N--
	     b- B? !Y X So+ Sp+ !sb wb- +999999