Subject: Re: PAM
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/27/2002 16:50:52
> > - PAM is standard.
> "Standard"? I don't think so. It's common, but it's far from being a
> real standard. I wonder if the GNU/Linux implementation can even load
> and use a binary Solaris plugin (assuming it's for the same target CPU).
PAM is a standard. http://www.opengroup.org/tech/rfc/mirror-rfc/rfc86.0.txt
NH 3.4.0nb1U D ben-** HP:99(99) PW:99(99) AC:-10 *
[++ ) P- S !D p-- $++ !t s+++ w+ E-- PS PP G- C+ I+ @W(3) N--
b- B? !Y X So+ Sp+ !sb wb- +999999