Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Julio Merino <email@example.com>
Date: 08/27/2002 20:19:51
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 11:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > It's not like people didn't think about this stuff.
> Jason makes a point I think may have been missed by some of the folks
> uncomfortable with this change.
> Folks DID think about this. At first *I* didn't like it. However after
> hearing all of the thoughts on it, I concluded that making /bin and /sbin
> dynamic is the best way to do what we want (maintainable locale support,
> nsswitch modules, auth modules later on).
I second that.
At a first glance I didn't like it, too. But after reading all the pros and
cons of the thread, I like the change as it is the best way to go.
HispaBSD admin - http://www.HispaBSD.org
For the developer - http://buildtool.sourceforge.net
Julio Merino <email@example.com>