Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Johnny Billquist <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
Date: 08/27/2002 09:45:00
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> *Sigh* I've already gone through at least three times why I consider
> /rescue to be a bad thing. Do I really need to do this again?
I'm not really concerned whether or not you like "/rescue". I want to
know *precisely* how falling back on statically linked tools in /rescue
is different in any real way than falling back oin statically linked
tools in /bin and /sbin.
-- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>