Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Johnny Billquist <>
From: Jason R Thorpe <>
List: current-users
Date: 08/27/2002 09:45:00
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:36:22PM +0200, Johnny Billquist wrote:

 > *Sigh* I've already gone through at least three times why I consider
 > /rescue to be a bad thing. Do I really need to do this again?

I'm not really concerned whether or not you like "/rescue".  I want to
know *precisely* how falling back on statically linked tools in /rescue
is different in any real way than falling back oin statically linked
tools in /bin and /sbin.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <>