Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Luke Mewburn <lukem@wasabisystems.com>
List: current-users
Date: 08/27/2002 14:00:29
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:45:38PM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
| > | even if /usr/lib/libc.so is a symlink, i think the above is an
| > | important point. think of shlib major bump (in libtermcap or whatever)
| > | and old binaries in /usr/pkg/bin.
| >this isn't a problem. i've run a converted system for a while, and
| >old applications (with just /usr/lib in the rpath) work ok.
|
| i see. how many libraries do you have in /lib?
| from Makefile, i guess the followings are in /lib. it is more than
| i guessed (i didn't expect to see libcrypto in the list...)
| libc
| libdes (= libcrypto)
| libedit
| libipsec
| libkrb
| libkvm
| libl
| libm
| librmt
| libtermcap
| libutil
| liby
| libz
My i386 has the following shared libraries in /lib:
libc libcrypt libedit libipsec libkvm libm
libm387 libtermcap libtermlib libutil libz
Luke.