Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
Date: 08/27/2002 14:00:29
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 12:45:38PM +0900, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
| > | even if /usr/lib/libc.so is a symlink, i think the above is an
| > | important point. think of shlib major bump (in libtermcap or whatever)
| > | and old binaries in /usr/pkg/bin.
| >this isn't a problem. i've run a converted system for a while, and
| >old applications (with just /usr/lib in the rpath) work ok.
| i see. how many libraries do you have in /lib?
| from Makefile, i guess the followings are in /lib. it is more than
| i guessed (i didn't expect to see libcrypto in the list...)
| libdes (= libcrypto)
My i386 has the following shared libraries in /lib:
libc libcrypt libedit libipsec libkvm libm
libm387 libtermcap libtermlib libutil libz