Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Jason R Thorpe <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/27/2002 10:05:57
>> > I assume the saving is so that a NetBSD root file system can better fit
>> > onto things like flash? Should this and other such tricks (triming
>> > libc, ...) be left those people?
>>Actually, one of the biggest motivations is so that dlopen() is available
>>to these programs (think "locale").
> we need /usr/share/locale to support non-ASCII locales anyways,
> so the above point sounds a bit moot (even for locale advocate like me).
in other words: if the motive is locale support in binaries in /sbin,
we should solve it by providing dlopen() and friends to statically-
linked binaries. solving it by avoiding statically-linked binary looks
to me a wrong way (caveat: i'm no dynamic linkage guru).