Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Luke Mewburn <email@example.com>
From: Noriyuki Soda <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/27/2002 02:52:04
I think there is one issue which should be corrected in this proposal.
>>>>> On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:20:39 +1000, Luke Mewburn <email@example.com> said:
> The user visible changes of this include:
> + /usr/libexec/ld.elf_so is moved to /lib/ld.elf_so.
> A compatibility symlink is provided.
I believe this should be /libexec/ld.elf_so rather than /lib
as already pointed out in tech-userlevel.
1. We use "libexec" for this purpose. Using "lib" breaks consistency.
2. Although currently ld.elf_so is the only program which belongs to
this directory, that doesn't mean we never have such programs
(other than ld.elf_so) which should go to /libexec in the future.
Please remember that we had /usr/libdata in the days when we don't
have any contents in it yet.
3. Using "/lib/ld.elf_so" doesn't introduce compatiblity with other
systems. Note that Solaris and Linux uses "/lib/ld.so" rather than