Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
From: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/26/2002 15:56:56
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Bill Studenmund wrote:
# Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 15:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
# From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
# To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
# Cc: NetBSD-current Discussion List <email@example.com>
# Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
# On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Greywolf wrote:
# > [Oh, and to the zealots in either direction out there, in case it's not
# > clear -- I'm not necessarily arguing that this shouldn't be done, but I
# > am arguing that it shouldn't be enforced (I may not agree with the way
# > you run your system, but I will defend to the death your right to so
# > run it :) Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion on LD_STATIC_BIN (probably more
# Sommerfeld?? My name changed? I have a beard? I live on the East Coast??
# When did my life change so?
Sorry, folks, I'm ill (yes, yes, but especially so today). :)
[with apologies to LHS and RHS of above.]
NetBSD: Agnostics in the Platform Religious Wars.