Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Greywolf <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Bill Studenmund <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 15:49:40
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Greywolf wrote:
> [Oh, and to the zealots in either direction out there, in case it's not
> clear -- I'm not necessarily arguing that this shouldn't be done, but I
> am arguing that it shouldn't be enforced (I may not agree with the way
> you run your system, but I will defend to the death your right to so
> run it :) Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion on LD_STATIC_BIN (probably more
Sommerfeld?? My name changed? I have a beard? I live on the East Coast??
When did my life change so?
> accurately termed LD_STATIC_ROOT) has already addressed this.]