Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: Greywolf <>
From: Bill Studenmund <>
List: current-users
Date: 08/26/2002 15:49:40
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002, Greywolf wrote:

> [Oh, and to the zealots in either direction out there, in case it's not
>  clear -- I'm not necessarily arguing that this shouldn't be done, but I
>  am arguing that it shouldn't be enforced (I may not agree with the way
>  you run your system, but I will defend to the death your right to so
>  run it :)  Bill Sommerfeld's suggestion on LD_STATIC_BIN (probably more

Sommerfeld?? My name changed? I have a beard? I live on the East Coast??
When did my life change so?

>  accurately termed LD_STATIC_ROOT) has already addressed this.]

Take care,