Subject: Re: HEADS UP: migration to fully dynamic linked "base" system
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <email@example.com>
Date: 08/26/2002 18:20:38
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 05:32:11PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I also know that I don't want it to ever be possible on at least some of
> my systems (and perhaps even all of them) for a static linked program to
> dynamically link new code into itself.
Well, then, why aren't you leading the charge against mmap() and mprotect()?